WinningDon't like them? Don't buy them. No need to open a sack of French cries about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WinningDon't like them? Don't buy them. No need to open a sack of French cries about it.
I don't use it while plinking. I use it when I carry my suppressed pistol to the office. I've tested a lot of subsonic hollow point ammo and the talons sound better to me. Like I said, don't like them? Don't buy them. Don't go jumping on folks just because they like them. You like midgets which I find discusting but if it floats your boat then knock yourself out.
Winning
quiet*Quite you.
First off no Offense meant, but I find it interesting when people talk about age vs usefulness. I understand that the point you are trying to make is that newer tech in rounds make them do X better, but at what in age (or age of technology) does a round start to suck. People have not gotten more dense since the 90's, they have not become more bullet resistant since the 90's. So a good round that was made in the 90's (or the tech created then) should still be plenty effective.
I regularly use ammo made anywhere from the 40's to the 80's and have never seen anything that would make me think they are bad rounds unless you are talking about .303 british
I carry ranger t series in several of my guns, it was issued to me first and I have bought more for my other guns. I have seen in the field what those rounds can do and am very impressed.