• All users have been asked to change their passwords. This is just a precaution. Thanks!
  • If you are having trouble with your password change please click here for help.

Did sig fix the p320 and is it still a good gun to have?

My first post was a light-hearted jab. I have called no names. I am debating this topic and even said I am not trying to be intentionally rude.

I am not afraid of running into anyone I have disagreed with in these forums. If they have an emotional reaction to words on a screen that is far more their problem than it is mine. And if it means they wish to have no dealings with me then they prove they are the type of person I'd rather not interact with either.
Fair enough, my post was not a threat in any way just to be clear, nor are my feelings hurt. I really don’t care. I was surprised by some of the responses though and maybe I took them the wrong way. I just figured we were better than that.
 
Fair enough, my post was not a threat in any way just to be clear, nor are my feelings hurt. I really don’t care. I was surprised by some of the responses though and maybe I took them the wrong way. I just figured we were better than that.

My good man.... I can say for a certainty that many are not 😅

The reason for the response is most of us have been following these "sigcidents" for quite some time and based on the breadcrumbs we have come to the undeniable conclusion that there is some type of problem with the 320.

There are a lot of theories, some folks have produced some rather convincing videos of replicating what they believe to be the cause in ways that are not replicable with other striker fired handguns.

And truly, the biggest issue of all isn't just the apparent mechanical flaws. It's how SIG USA has responded to it. Quietly "fixing" the drop-safe issue in the beginning while also saying it wasn't possible. Refusing to look into their design seriously and blaming every user that was shot by their own 320. Until their sweet government contract was at stake then they at least appeared to have dug into it.

And saying that anyone who expressed concern over these handguns were anti-gunners. While simultaneously trying to get laws passed to effectually make them "unsueable" for more unintended discharges.

I understand not immediately condemning a platform because someone accidently shot themselves and blamed the gun. Happens all the time. But it keeps happening, repeatedly, to the 320. Where there is smoke, there's usually fire and these things have been smoking for a while.
 
My good man.... I can say for a certainty that many are not 😅

The reason for the response is most of us have been following these "sigcidents" for quite some time and based on the breadcrumbs we have come to the undeniable conclusion that there is some type of problem with the 320.

There are a lot of theories, some folks have produced some rather convincing videos of replicating what they believe to be the cause in ways that are replicable with other striker fired handguns.

And truly, the biggest issue of all isn't just the apparent mechanical flaws. It's how SIG USA has responded to it. Quietly "fixing" the drop-safe issue in the beginning while also saying it wasn't possible. Refusing to look into their design seriously and blaming every user that was shot by their own 320. Until their sweet government contract was at stake then they at least appeared to have dug into it.

And saying that anyone who expressed concern over these handguns were anti-gunners. While simultaneously trying to get laws passed to effectually make them "unsueable" for more unintended discharges.

I understand not immediately condemning a platform because someone accidently shot themselves and blamed the gun. Happens all the time. But it keeps happening, repeatedly, to the 320. Where there is smoke, there's usually fire and these things have been smoking for a while.
^Pretty much sums it up.
 
Back
Top Bottom