Th
This is the civil way to do it before things become uncivil. There's no testable logic behind their policy.
Same applies to suppressors as a whole- they classify them as firearms and they simply don't meet the definition of firearm Andy more than the FRT meets the definition of machine-gun.
The same way it did when AFT was gonna ban m855 because it was armor piercing. They got their ass reamed and backed off.How exactly does a strongly worded letter punish them? I'm seriously asking, because it seems as though the atf continues to just do what they want.
This is the civil way to do it before things become uncivil. There's no testable logic behind their policy.
Same applies to suppressors as a whole- they classify them as firearms and they simply don't meet the definition of firearm Andy more than the FRT meets the definition of machine-gun.