help me to understand why he needs to sign it? from my understanding, without action it will go into effect july 1? i think what needs to be impressed on deal is to not veto. that's the only issue. politically, i think his people think he'll lose more than he gains by signing. pro 2A folks might be pissed at him for not signing, but if it's law come election time, only the very hardcore will hold it against him. but by signing he energizes gun control folks and fuels a 2A debate in the next election cycle that doesn't need to be there. i think this is a case where folks shouldn't be up in arms about process, but focus on results. if come july 2 it's not law, then there's a problem. i think deal is aware of that. 'nuff said.
True, but I have no tolerance for men, especially politicians, who can't make decisions. They don't sign and believe their hands are clean? By not doing anything he had still done something. The law passes and good for us. The bad part is more so called Conservatives should proudly embrace their support of the 2A and enough of this tip toe crap so they don't offend the wussy prohibitionists. Deal needs to stand on his own and sign the bill proclaiming his support of our Constitution.
During the two ice storms earlier this year I never understood why Deal could not come out and face the press by himself, on his own two feet. Every time he and the mayor (who lost the Braves) would come out they had an entourage of 10 people around them. Who the hell were those people and what were they supposed to be? Don't they have jobs and shouldn't they be doing them?