Police dogs vs ctizens dogs

[LMK]

Waffle tacos

Yep

 

[randomreader]

BS the training I went through and what a rentacop goes through are totally different. Their training is not funded by the govt. Instead it's designed and funded in the private sector

Lmao, the flip side of that being that if a rentacop shoots 9 innocent people at the empire state building while aiming for one man, he'd spend the rest of his life in prison. Or if a rentacop heard a fugitive Dorner was in the area and rammed a truck and tried to kill the driver thinking it was Dorner, he'd be arrested and do years in prison for attempted murder. Unlike police, who can do what they please.

But facts are facts. You dodged the question because the only logical answer is to realize the idiocy of how cops regularly shoot citizen's dogs for no reason and suffer no punishment, but shooting a police dog is years in prison.

 

[crimsontidepride728]

Lmao, the flip side of that being that if a rentacop shoots 9 innocent people at the empire state building while aiming for one man, he'd spend the rest of his life in prison. Or if a rentacop heard a fugitive Dorner was in the area and rammed a truck and tried to kill the driver thinking it was Dorner, he'd be arrested and do years in prison for attempted murder. Unlike police, who can do what they please.

But facts are facts. You dodged the question because the only logical answer is to realize the idiocy of how cops regularly shoot citizen's dogs for no reason and suffer no punishment, but shooting a police dog is years in prison.

How often do police dogs attack innocent people?

 

[LMK]

In for the giveaway.

 

[chucklenut]

That is not a valid analogy. Just because someone goes through police training does not mean they are police officers. It is not the training, or even the function, that makes a law enforcement officer an officer. It is the county, city, etc bestowing that honor upon someone or something. In this case it is the dog.

so police cruisers and a cops sidearm are LEOs?

 

[chucklenut]

I mean it's how u look at it i guess

no its not

dog =/= person

pretty simple

 

[chucklenut]

I think the problem is that someone shooting a police dog would be doing so in an attempt to flee the police or fight being arrested. That is why the charge is stricter for shooting a police dog vs shooting a dog in general.

shouldnt it just be resisting arrest and destruction of property then?

police canines dont have arrest power

 

[Gigabyte71]

no its not

dog =/= person

pretty simple

LEO (Human or Canine) better and more important than everyday citizens.

 

[crimsontidepride728]

no its not

dog =/= person

pretty simple

Right. But in this instance they both have a job. Both are trained to do said job. And both are in danger executing duties of said job. Your right though.

 

[Bonecollector]

shouldnt it just be resisting arrest and destruction of property then?

police canines dont have arrest power

You have a point. When dogs start slapping cuffs on and reading rights hell I don't want to be a free citizen anymore. I'd want bars protecting me.