Walking in the middle of the street while OBLIVIOUS to the large vehicles in the street IS a safety concern to her AND the drivers of the vehicles. They asked for her name to file with a report of the stop for exactly the reason it was used. To cover them in case someone CLAIMED something that wasn't true.I am not taking her side. She definitely made a mountain out of a mole hill - she presumed that the LEOs are suspecting her of a crime from the very start. That's her own insecurity showing.
That said. This is still the land of the FREE or less free. It is a bit Gestapo to be pulled over in your own subdivision and asked for your name and papers in broad daylight. Plenty of people walk like that in my subdivision. Older folks, power walkers and joggers don't like the sidewalk because they are trying to avoid negotiating the concrete slabs that are not always leveled or the cut in someone's drive way. That can cause them to trip or rolled their ankles if not careful. As a driver, I don't like them out in the streets, but I do understand why they do that and simply move over to avoid them. The cop tells her she should walk on the other side for safety concerns. Why? He wouldn't have said that if she was on a bike. Yes, there was a bit of profiling going on, if it was strictly a safety concern, he would have pulled up next to her, roll down the window and tell her it's safer to walk on the other side, without the need to turn on the blue lights & siren.
Really? You can't walk in the U.S. of A and flap your arms without getting pulled over?
Wonder how Hitler's Gestapo would have reacted to a printed story critical of them, much less one that was greatly exaggerated and fabricated to raise their status as victim and crusader?