Its not like they make policy like that public. I said some places discriminate and don't hire people with an higher IQ. That is documented in court cases so there's nothing for me to prove here.
His blanket statement that in some places a sub 104 IQ was a hiring guideline implied without providing examples that LEO hiring practices skewed towards a lower intelligence of all law enforcement....this could not be farther from the facts....Yeah? Well what about now though? Prove it!
In fact the single department that posted these requirements NINETEEN YEARS AGO has at some point since removed the IQ standard from prerequisite employment guidelines.
http://ci.new-london.ct.us/content/8251/7455/7808.aspx
You guys just love to bash them regardless of facts, so don't let facts get in the way, carry on....