It’s threads like this that reinforce the utter contempt and disgust I have with the vast majority of lawyers. They’ve got decent, law-abiding folks afraid to defend themselves in the best ways possible.
x1 million. I cannot agree more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s threads like this that reinforce the utter contempt and disgust I have with the vast majority of lawyers. They’ve got decent, law-abiding folks afraid to defend themselves in the best ways possible.
Isn't it also true that many officers simply aren't that proficient with their weapons and a LE officer is much more likely to have to hold someone at gunpoint than an average citizen?
Not trying to dump on the officers that don't practice that much, but a heavy trigger reduces the likelihood of an ND at a very unfortunate moment.
Still waiting on that case where a gun modification is what ultimately led to a conviction. View attachment 1847636
His biggest mistake was talking to the police.
Ok..It’s not just about convictions. It could be about losing your home to pay your legal fees to fight bs claims that you made your gun more deadly or something stupid...
And examples of that are...It’s not just about convictions. It could be about losing your home to pay your legal fees to fight bs claims that you made your gun more deadly or something stupid...
You keep going back to insulting a person's ability to shoot. cmshoot has already made you an offer about that. So will I.There were several articles posted that cited many court cases where gun modifications and ammo were used in court and had to be defended. You can start by reading up on those...
If you need a trigger job to hit the target, and want to concoct your own fragmenting hand loads, go for it man. It’s a free country.