I'm just saying pointing a loaded gun at something that you don't intend to shoot is breaking one of the safety rules.........is it not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I often wondered what the significance to having a scope on a rifle that you intend on shooting a large animal in the side with it anyway.
Wouldn't it be easier to skip the scope cost and the sighting, and just shoot the deer in it's side using iron sights?
Rules are made to be broken.I'm just saying pointing a loaded gun at something that you don't intend to shoot is breaking one of the safety rules.........is it not?
I hunt drunk with my finger on the trigger pointing it at everything like my scope was a pair of glasses and I could care less about what's on the otherside.
I hunt drunk with my finger on the trigger pointing it at everything like my scope was a pair of glasses and I could care less about what's on the otherside.
Number one? If you're just shooting "the deer in it's side," you're doing it wrong and inhumanely and you probably shouldn't be hunting in the first place.
Number two? If you're unable to understand the simple light gathering principles of an optic that allow you too connect sooner than irons before sunrise and later after sunset, or the superior precision, verification, and magnification that an optics brings - you probably wouldn't be convinced even after an explanation.
I thought I was the only one. "Hold my beer and watch this, wheeeeeewwwww!"
I'm just saying pointing a loaded gun at something that you don't intend to shoot is breaking one of the safety rules.........is it not?