Of course not… that would ruin a good theory.Got an actual argument?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course not… that would ruin a good theory.Got an actual argument?
Riddle me this. With the Law of Inverse Squared, how bright the full moon is that once you actually are on it wouldn't it blind you? I'm genuinely ignorant and would like to see if y'all could explain it to a layman. I don't know if any if y'all have experienced this but there's plenty of times when it's kinda cool outside and there isn't a breeze and the moon is full in the shade it is warmer and when you step into the light it gets noticeably cooler.
Well, thanks, Debbie Downer.That first video about the shadow being the only solid evidence is about as convincing as the flat earther evidence arguments. Not to mention it's been debunked plenty of times and the 90 degree shadow thing can be recreated on earth to show it. They usually come from people who watch something online and think it's all the proof they need.
I'm always skeptical of the government, but some of these "evidence" videos in this thread are pretty laughable, especially the annoying cheese head guy. That's your guy you're going with?
The biggest issue I have with saying it's fake, is the hundreds and thousands of people who were involved with the moon landing projects. They all kept the fake landing a secret? And Russia was able to do the same thing and all their people involved kept it a secret too? All those folks involved in faking it in a studio in the USA and Russia were able to keep it under wraps all these years?
Not to mention the guy in the deathbed confession video has absolutely zero evidence to back up his claim other than, my dad told me this and he had insider info.
Thats because it was filmed on earth in the first place......the 90 degree shadow thing can be recreated on earth to show it.
The point is, it debunks the guys whole argument that it "doesn't happen on earth" because all shadows run parallel. He literally says that in his video. But the fact of the matter is yes it can and does. So in other words, having that as his only evidence makes his argument weak.Thats because it was filmed on earth in the first place......
But, ‘’weak’’ does not necessarily mean ‘’invalid’’.The point is, it debunks the guys whole argument that it "doesn't happen on earth" because all shadows run parallel. He literally says that in his video. But the fact of the matter is yes it can and does. So in other words, having that as his only evidence makes his argument weak.