• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

$750 Glocks

"Intent" is a huge fuzzy gray area that it's just about pointless to speculate about it. Someone could buy a pile of guns one day and then have a car accident the next, and really need money to fix their car. Individual need isn't something we intend to look into at all.

So we are only required to follow the easy to understand part of the law? Is ignorance of the law an excuse now? It was clearly a violation of the 1st question on a 4473 constituting a straw purchase. We allow criminals on this sight for the sole purpose of revenue? We are supposed to be an example to new gun owners and this is how we show them. Only follow the law if it is in black and white? This guy should have his account deleted and verbally reminded of the law and possible penalties for his violations, instead I receive a warning for pointing out the law?
 
So we are only required to follow the easy to understand part of the law? Is ignorance of the law an excuse now? It was clearly a violation of the 1st question on a 4473 constituting a straw purchase. We allow criminals on this sight for the sole purpose of revenue? We are supposed to be an example to new gun owners and this is how we show them. Only follow the law if it is in black and white? This guy should have his account deleted and verbally reminded of the law and possible penalties for his violations, instead I receive a warning for pointing out the law?

I've thought the same thing. If it wernt a question on the form then it wouldn't matter, but I seems like filling out the 4473 dishonestly is kinda shady. But that's just me.
 
Back
Top Bottom