When you're talking about the second amendment anything someone says after the word "but" is usually complete bull****.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really if you think about it, most all states limit the number of rounds you can have in a shotgun or rifle when hunting so the government should outlaw all feeding devices with a capacity greater than 3 rounds.Nobody needs a 30, 60, 90, 100rd magazine, it's just an accessory and not really part of the 2A...nobody needs a high powered scope, it makes a sniper rifle and nobody should be sniping...nobody needs a suppressor, it's just an accessory not even mentioned in the 2A...change my mind...
ya think? But.......................bahahahahaha what a ****in jokeMan, That would make a great Song!!
Really if you think about it, most all states limit the number of rounds you can have in a shotgun or rifle when hunting so the government should outlaw all feeding devices with a capacity greater than 3 rounds.
And rocks...don't forget rocks, them things are like everywhere. Somebody could get hurt.we all just really need to go back to black powder muskets, we can just tell the criminalz thats all they are allowed to use right, im sure they'll play by the rules.
After that we can deal with those other rapid fire assault weapons. . .i think they are called bows. . . 20 arrows in a minute? only folks who want to commit mass murder would want something like that . . .and they're silent! obviously only made for murderous assassins!!!
I understand the slippery slope, but these things are for the stupid. Totally inaccurate spray of fire that takes 1000's of rounds of practice to tame. Is there anyone that likes them? I agree that banning anything 2A sucks, but bump-stocks? Change my mind.