I didn't think that any one was contesting my opinion. I think that we all agree that if someone is in your house you are going to defend yourself. The normal protocol is to stop the threat. Now how would one stop the threat, shoot until the other person can't do harm back to you. (Normally this would mean dead.) While I do not think this guy was right at all, the result would have been the same if these two teens had broken into my house, there would be two very dead teens. Now had my gun malfunctioned would I have gone for a back up, sure. Would I have executed them NO WAY. I think this is where the problem lies and I don't wish to defend him, but I just want to understand what is truly going on.
Some are stating if they were the father of this teen girl that they would be upset and seeking death penalty. I'm sorry but that make no sense, if you defend the right to defend your home. All the bullets I own are lethal if used to that extent.
I am only attempting to get into the mindset of this man. It has been pointed out that he was broken into twice before, and it was believed that the same teens were involved. I do not know if he was home during this time, but if he was, did he call the police? If he did what was the outcome? Obviously the police didn't put a stop to these individuals. So, while it is wrong for the guy not to have called the police and to act in such a way, it is understandable if he had called in the past to write them off as unable to help him. When you are defenseless you will do anything! This is my thought on the matter, it doesn't make it right, it's just a fact. Think about The Christmas Story where Ralph beats up the bully, he lost complete control, because he felt defenseless.
Some are stating if they were the father of this teen girl that they would be upset and seeking death penalty. I'm sorry but that make no sense, if you defend the right to defend your home. All the bullets I own are lethal if used to that extent.
I am only attempting to get into the mindset of this man. It has been pointed out that he was broken into twice before, and it was believed that the same teens were involved. I do not know if he was home during this time, but if he was, did he call the police? If he did what was the outcome? Obviously the police didn't put a stop to these individuals. So, while it is wrong for the guy not to have called the police and to act in such a way, it is understandable if he had called in the past to write them off as unable to help him. When you are defenseless you will do anything! This is my thought on the matter, it doesn't make it right, it's just a fact. Think about The Christmas Story where Ralph beats up the bully, he lost complete control, because he felt defenseless.