Inspired by another thread, I decided to create a poll. For me the answer is a definite "no".
Firearms have been a part of my life since I was old enough to start creating memories. Playing with toy guns, and eventually graduating to an air rifle at age 4, and a real gun at age 8 (A Marlin model 60) guns were the cornerstone of all that was pure, good, innocent, and wonderful during my childhood. Before age 13 I walked hundreds of miled of river bottom with my dog and my .22, with my father and my .410 single shot chasing pheasants, and spent hours upon hours shooting every type of firearm imaginable at the pasture. As I grew and mature, so did my love of guns and shooting.
My tastes in firearms has evolved, as has my understanding of how important it is for the people to always have the right to defense against those bigger, stronger, or faster than them. I do not consider it a right, for the physically weaker to "get" to fistfight with someone intending to do them harm. I have also come to understand the broader, and more far reaching consequences of becoming a nation of limited private firearms ownership..look no further than the oppressed in North Africa. So anyway, I understand how some people have a less personal relationship to the second amendment, but I do not. I am unwilling to accept that the main reason for crafting this amendment can be, and will be ignored. We are not just hunters and collectors, we are citizens.
Your thoughts, opinions, stories?
HGUNHNTR
Firearms have been a part of my life since I was old enough to start creating memories. Playing with toy guns, and eventually graduating to an air rifle at age 4, and a real gun at age 8 (A Marlin model 60) guns were the cornerstone of all that was pure, good, innocent, and wonderful during my childhood. Before age 13 I walked hundreds of miled of river bottom with my dog and my .22, with my father and my .410 single shot chasing pheasants, and spent hours upon hours shooting every type of firearm imaginable at the pasture. As I grew and mature, so did my love of guns and shooting.
My tastes in firearms has evolved, as has my understanding of how important it is for the people to always have the right to defense against those bigger, stronger, or faster than them. I do not consider it a right, for the physically weaker to "get" to fistfight with someone intending to do them harm. I have also come to understand the broader, and more far reaching consequences of becoming a nation of limited private firearms ownership..look no further than the oppressed in North Africa. So anyway, I understand how some people have a less personal relationship to the second amendment, but I do not. I am unwilling to accept that the main reason for crafting this amendment can be, and will be ignored. We are not just hunters and collectors, we are citizens.
Your thoughts, opinions, stories?
HGUNHNTR
Last edited: