This is true but while income may be higher and potential for growth larger; it could be argued that much of the benefit is offset by high prices and often lack of individual estate building (many city dwellers do not have equity tied to assets such as a home nor do many younger folks invest )Ummmmm... You know they best advice you could probably give a young person who wants to maximize their lifetime income is to move to a big city? The economic data is quite clear that when you control for race/education level/ income level those people who move to big cities do better (financially) than the ones that stayed behind. (The research doesn't say who is happier, just who makes more money)
There is likely some selection bias in that those who chose to move are more go-getter than the ones who decided to stay, but their is no doubt there are network effects in which people's income growth is faster in big cities than in other areas. It's not partisan, it's just the facts.
https://research.stlouisfed.org/pub...nopses/2017/12/20/city-growth-and-real-income
Also, the above only holds true to folks embroiled with a career and career path