I know you’ve been doing a lot of research into forged uppers the past few days, but what about lowers?I am not an Anderson fan just because of the flowing meine horse. Who in the hell know these days what's what. I mean there are so many manufacturers and forges it hard to tell who is getting what. I would have to say a military issued Colt would have a better lower and that's as far as I am willing to commit to. There are a lot of good units out. Companies not only have to be competitively priced but quality has to be of decent proportion as well.
My nephew recently bought a Bushmaster at right around 400 bucks. I took out my old 2004 and the serial number and model number stamp looked deeper and more consistent from top to bottom. The new Bushmaster lower the stamp was shallow and varied in depth from one side to the other. It looked a bit hurried.
All I will say is if I had two receivers in front me one Anderson and one Colt and I was going to buy it for a build, I believe I would have to take the Colt piece. That would be to pass on the cheesy logo. Either that or look at another manufacturer and buy the one that looked more substantial and had a better finish.
I’ve read online that most manufacturers get their raw forged lowers from one of a small handful of suppliers and then finish them themselves.
That would mean that as far as the actual metal quality goes, Anderson and Colt are pretty much the same right?
The difference would just be the quality of the finish and how tight their tolerances are and how strict their quality control is.
Am I right?