• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

RDS vs Irons

So again, I agree with you in most part. However, what is have found through the years is that RDS's make up for poor disciplined shooters much more than they do those that understand and adequately apply the fundamentals.
Can you be faster with a RDS? Yes.
Can you be more accurate with an RDS? Yes.

However I view an RDS in the same way that I view chatgpt, can it help you if used properly? Absolutely. However, most times it's used to cover up inadequacy in practice and performance.
"However, most times it's used to cover up inadequacy in practice and performance."

This is exactly why they are so effective.
 
To be honest, you likely don't need an RDS for what their value is compared to just iron sights. In fact, most self-defense shooting distances rarely involve "sighting" over just point shooting. That said, the value of an RDS becomes very apparent doing drills beyond 10 yards out to distances of 50 yards and including more than one target. You split times will vastly beat iron sights and accuracy is usually much, much better. For close in drills, like arms-length to 1-2 yards, it's all point shooting anyways, so there's no disadvantaged to having an optic.

Now, I do run drills with a few handguns that don't have an optic (J-frame, Glock43, Ruger LCP Max), but I also don't practice at 25+ yard drills; I would be seeking cover or escape:becky:



Outside of a pocket gun, I prefer an RDS.

ROCK6
I shoot coke cans at 100 yards with pistol irons. YMMV.
 
please post video of you doing that from the draw in reasonable time. Or your USPSA practiscore division
How about this?

1744555176452.png
 
Back
Top Bottom