cant go wrong with 2 to the chest, 1 to the head. repeat if threat is still a threat.
This for sure, but i wonder how clear my thoughts would be in the situation.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
cant go wrong with 2 to the chest, 1 to the head. repeat if threat is still a threat.
X2Once a high level of proficiency is achieved with ones pistol, these types of scenarios, if done properly, provide shooters with the skills necessary to win fights.... both on the street & possibly in the courtroom.
Only shooting at paper or metal targets is too one dimensional.
Contending with thinking, moving, unpredictable opponents is a whole 'nother world which is what happens in the real word of life or death encounters.
Hmm, not all judges and juries agree:
Not all bad guys are going to stand up straight in front of you. I'm aiming for whatever body part is easily visible at the moment, chest, head, legs, ass, I don't care. If its a clean case of self defense it really shouldn't matter.
Stopping Power
As documented in the article an attacker may not stop advancing even when taking hits in center mass/ vital organs. The cop had to shoot him in the head to end the gun fight. This got me thinking. In a civilian self defense situation, if you shoot the attacker in the head, would LEO, judge or DA or whatever see it as malicious intent and not self defense?