No, frankly I don’t believe he wouldn’t have videoed the event. PERIODDo you think he screwed up when holstering? Totally possible and still makes my point about why it's bad to appendix carry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, frankly I don’t believe he wouldn’t have videoed the event. PERIODDo you think he screwed up when holstering? Totally possible and still makes my point about why it's bad to appendix carry.
Sorry man. I don't know what case you're talking about. Is it the police cam video of the cops wrestling with the guy when a P320's AD's? My 1st comment was just to the guy worried about his his P320 just going off. I did't see the videos before posting that. I'm just glancing through comments here. I have seen the video analysis of that. There's more than one P320 AD caught on camera. I incorrectly got that one confused with another video of a female officer carrying a duffel bag to her patrol car when her pistol AD's. In the body cam video you actually see the officer smack the gun that's about to fall out of the holster with his elbow. There is several of these videos, and it's not just P320's. In every video I've seen people were doing things that could snag the trigger of an unsecured half holstered gun. No one is just sitting there completely idle. No one is ever able to replicate the discharge. Now drop safe is a different story. The P320 had an issue and fixed it. I believe that incident opened Sig up to all this blame for "going off" out of the blue, and everyone that has an AD with the P320 is going to cash in. Sig is likely just going to settle and pay everything hoping this goes away. I'll never consider that proof the gun just goes off. It's never anyone just sitting idle caught on camera, and the gun that just goes off never does it again. Perhaps I'm wrong. Tomorrow one of these AD guns may be proven to go off if it's loaded with just a mild bump, but I doubt it. Especially when you see who's funding all these lawsuits against Sig. It's a bunch of anti-gun groups, so now I feel the need to defend a gun I've owned and didn't even like. You really think Sig P320's just AD all on their own or at the slightest bump? It's some kind of super secret un-diagnosable issue? You think Sig flooded the civilian market and the military with a bunch of unsafe pistols?
Do you really expect that they would admit to any modification?I have made reference to one incident that I am particularly familiar with. The information that I read shows no modifications to the P320, nor to the department-issued Safariland holster. The firearm and holster were in proper working order. P320 discharged while properly strapped in the holster, without any external stimulus.
There is more information, but the lawsuit is currently in arbitration, and that’s all I’m comfortable giving out at this time. I can say that in this particular incident, much of what you claim is refuted.
There are far more incidents than the ones that made the rounds due to shared videos.
Not everyone shares videos of crap that happens.
Not all incidents have associated videos.
Some incidents are under legal gag orders, which prevent videos and other info from being shared.
Do you really expect that they would admit to any modification?
To your points, you know that applies to all manufacturers.
Operative word is “Official”In at least one case that I am familiar with, the official documents state that, upon examination and inspection, no modifications were found to the holster or firearm.
Operative word is “Official”
I get it, really I do. I just believe some manufacturers hide stuff better than others. Sure seems like the Glock ADs/NDs reports just disappeared.
But they were a thing at one time.