Alright, I was flipping through the most recent issue of "Recoil" today and came across this that was interesting in an article about Chris Costa. I thought I would post it because of this "my family is worth it" debate that keeps going round and round whenever there is a discussion about what gun to carry comes up. I don't think that anyone here is going to argue that this guy that spends most of his life training military, law enforcement and high end security personnel is blatantly wrong for choosing what he has chosen for his personal defense the way that you would berate a forum member....... So he has an unlimited gun budget and gun companies throwing guns at him begging him to use them and this is what he carry's ... A GLOCK 19
I'm not suggesting that you should carry a Glock but I am suggesting that some of you should stop berating people for carrying this "cheap" gun instead of a $3200 nighthawk or some such nonsense and justifying it by saying "you should save up for the best of the best of the best gun to carry because your family is worth it" and trying to make people feel like they are putting themselves or their family in danger for carrying a cheaper firearm.
In a gun fight, as long as you both have reliable guns that you can hit the target with that extra 2k that you put into your gun doesn't make any difference.
View attachment 137835
I'm not suggesting that you should carry a Glock but I am suggesting that some of you should stop berating people for carrying this "cheap" gun instead of a $3200 nighthawk or some such nonsense and justifying it by saying "you should save up for the best of the best of the best gun to carry because your family is worth it" and trying to make people feel like they are putting themselves or their family in danger for carrying a cheaper firearm.
In a gun fight, as long as you both have reliable guns that you can hit the target with that extra 2k that you put into your gun doesn't make any difference.
View attachment 137835
Last edited: