Saudi Terriost Purchased Glock Legally

[lostchild]

It is every human beings natural right to defend themselves, their loved ones or their property. Whether you consider that right from god or a natural right from birth is up to the individual. The 2nd amendment was just a restriction placed on the government saying that right cannot be infringed upon.

and yet we have had a constant stream of infringements over the years.

 

[pavogrande]

Appears like a few folk here might have trouble passing the test to become a citizen --

 

[chucklenut]

So when a Muslim shoots a few people now we think background checks would have prevented it

ya, had the us gov done a background check and not let a saudi piece of **** national into the country......

 

[Trailrider]

ya, had the us gov done a background check and not let a saudi piece of **** national into the country......

But in this case, he would have passed the background check it sounds like. He was at the base as part of a training program. He was in the Saudi Royal Airforce so I'm sure he would have cleared a check at least on paper. Hell he was able to legally purchase a hunting license and gun.

 

[pavogrande]

The problems with a few legal saudis pales in comparison with the millions of ILLEGAL latinos and asians here --

 

[The Meerkat]

Terriost. New kind of terrorist.

 

[Old_School]

and yet we have had a constant stream of infringements over the years.

...and Congress is still arguing about it...

Sent from my moto z4 using Tapatalk

 

[chucklenut]

But in this case, he would have passed the background check it sounds like. He was at the base as part of a training program. He was in the Saudi Royal Airforce so I'm sure he would have cleared a check at least on paper. Hell he was able to legally purchase a hunting license and gun.

so maybe the saudis arent the allies we think they are??

 

[Trailrider]

so maybe the saudis arent the allies we think they are??

Absolutely not. Remember how must of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudi but we attacked Afghanistan instead?

 

[chucklenut]

Absolutely not. Remember how must of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudi but we attacked Afghanistan instead?

afghanistan was physically harboring son-uv-a-bitch number 1 and wouldnt give him up

pakistan too

but we should have dumped the saudis right then and there as their protectorate. right now in yemen its USA, the wahhabist saudis, and al queda unified in fighting the houthi rebels

a ****ed up world aint it?