Yes, that's what I wrote. Thanks for emphasizing the point.
However, we don't live in an anarchic society. We live in a society of laws. We choose to vest powers in representative government, for the purpose of resolving or reducing conflict where the freedom of multiple parties would otherwise collide. We also embrace freedom of speech. The women behind dogsbite.org, or Gabby Giffords, have the right to advocate for whatever they see fit. You don't have to like them. You don't have to agree with them. But their right to do so is absolute. Much more so than your right to own an animal that society believes is a genuine threat to public safety. Don't believe me? See if you can find a rattlesnake for sale anywhere, and whether or not you can lawfully keep one as a domestic companion. Every one of the 50 states has laws limiting ownership of such things (there's that pesky 10th Amendment). Such laws have been validated by court decisions, local, state and federal, many times.
Sure she has a right to advocate whatever she wants, the problem is when people think there bias little colored charts are real scientific research.
Dogbites.org's mission is to promote breed specific legislation based on the feelings of looney soccer mom's. Let's take a look at a list of every single legitimate dogs related organizations stance on breed specific legislation (even the CDC).
https://stopbsl.org/bsloverview/the-lack-of-professional-support/#aba
Literally none of them support breed specific legislation as a way to reduce dog bites or fatalities.