space review huh? that couldnt be focused on space/solar could it?
If you look at the article, it's mainly focused on E1/E3 EMP generation and effect relative to weapon yield and altitude detonation. They do a comparison to solar flares, but the majority of the analysis is focused on nuclear deteonation.
It means use science. Look man I'm not sure why you are so intent on trying to say I and the military are wrong on EMP/Faraday cages, but its getting old.
Look back at the thread. I never said the military was wrong. I took issue with the fact that you claimed a gun safe is not a Faraday cage, which is an incorrect statement.
Have you even read the MIL-STD I posted, or are you just arguing for fun?
I'm sure what they specify is a very effective. I'm sure it's a very high standard. That doesn't mean no other Faraday cages work. That remains the point of my argument.
Here is one page of very many in there:
View attachment 748880
Notice the frequency on the X-axis. That axis goes to 0.00002998 meters. Thats 0.001180315 inches.
this isnt the end-all part of the handbook through. Lots of signals penetrate steel, or gun safes, etc. They have specific requirements for a reason.
you want to tell people that a steel safe is fine, go for it.
I'll point them to actual data and requirements used by the military.
They can pick.
Your point is that a graph's X-axis of frequency goes to a very small number? Why wouldn't it? In theory, it continues to the right, to an infinitely small number.
Posting that graph and saying "Look how small the numbers can get!" is akin to going to a football game and saying "Look, the scoreboard goes to 999!" as an indicator of how your team will play that day.
Racist.
Care to explain why you are adding this to your posts? Are you addressing me with that label? If so, why?