Or they took one to the noggin.I will bet HST’s were used vs. FMJ’s....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or they took one to the noggin.I will bet HST’s were used vs. FMJ’s....
What's your point? Why do we care about the poor ammunition choices of bad guys on the street? We already know shot placement is everything.
What was the question?
Glad you asked.
Everyone sloughs off into a caliber debate.
Supposedly 30 shot semi-autos have made the revolver obsolete, supposedly because of the possibility of encountering "multiple thugs intent on doing harm" I believe is how one poster put it.
So rather than speculating on "what if" scenarios, here is a real life situation, where
(a) you have a pistol marksman who has been certifiably trained to a minimum level of competence in accuracy and gun handling,
(b) Who encounters multiple bad guys at point blank range
(c) Is only able to hit one of the perps, despite having 40 rounds or so at his disposal, he is able to only inconvenience the bad guy.
and
(d) ends up getting shot hisself.
So my question is, which no one has addressed, is how the good guy would have been worse off if he were carrying a 6 shot revolver.
It was FMJI will bet HST’s were used vs. FMJ’s....
This right here folks, is wisdomI carry a .357 for 4 legged critters and a 9 mm for 2 legged critters.
I keep my head on a swivel and my elbows tucked in tight....you ain't gonna catch me slipping. ..beware the elbow wound