Purchase a Colt LE6920-OEM1 or OEM2 for $820 shipped and put your own furniture on it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That extra step when the barrels are received is what separates the premium parts suppliers from the run of the mill parts vendors.It’s a fact that SOLGW now sources their barrels from BA, but they’re built specifically for SOLGW and to their specs. Each and every barrel is then inspected and gauged when they get to SOLGW. Anything that doesn’t meet their criteria is sent back.
Purchase a Colt LE6920-OEM1 or OEM2 for $820 shipped and put your own furniture on it.
I'd still bet the single biggest difference between a PSA "specced" FN barrel and a SOLGW "specced" Ballistic advantage barrel is $$$$It’s a fact that SOLGW now sources their barrels from BA, but they’re built specifically for SOLGW and to their specs. Each and every barrel is then inspected and gauged when they get to SOLGW. Anything that doesn’t meet their criteria is sent back.
I'd still bet the single biggest difference between a PSA "specced" FN barrel and a SOLGW "specced" Ballistic advantage barrel is $$$$
Are the Hodge barrels 5R rifled? There is a known velocity increase in 5R compared to standard rifling. Especially compared to 4 or 6 groove.Hard to compare because they're quit different in manufacturing processes and materials. One is CHF/CL and the other is button-rifled and nitrided.
In general, the theory is that when all QC and tolerances are equal, that a nitrided barrel should be more accurate than a chrome-lined barrel. The nitride process is much easier to control the thickness/depth of than chrome-plating. This makes for a more uniform bore, which should be more accurate.
The hardness of nitride and hard chrome are very similar, so they should wear similarly. I believe that for a steady full-auto schedule of fire, that the combination of CHF and CL will yield better results than button-rifled and nitrided, but that's a moot point to the vast majority of us.
In general, button-rifling and nitriding is less expensive to do than CHF/CL, and folks that aren't shooting full-auto can't tell the difference, so not a bad option at all. I'm a big fan of the BA Hanson profile barrels with the pinned gas blocks.
What I'm really curious about is how Glenn Hodge designed his M855A1 EPR barrels to better resist the excessive wear caused by the M855A1 AND significantly boost velocity at the same time. Both of these facts have been proven by testing. The Hodge EPR barrels are made by FN, but they're made to Hodge's specs, and cost more than "regular" FN barrels, which cost more than PSA/FN barrels.
Another example of how one company can make multiple barrels using the CHF/CL methods, but vary widely in specs and resulting retail prices.
Are the Hodge barrels 5R rifled? There is a known velocity increase in 5R compared to standard rifling. Especially compared to 4 or 6 groove.
Good info. I was talking about the biggest difference to the end user though, someone who's gonna mount a red dot on their carbine.Hard to compare because they're quit different in manufacturing processes and materials. One is CHF/CL and the other is button-rifled and nitrided.
In general, the theory is that when all QC and tolerances are equal, that a nitrided barrel should be more accurate than a chrome-lined barrel. The nitride process is much easier to control the thickness/depth of than chrome-plating. This makes for a more uniform bore, which should be more accurate.
The hardness of nitride and hard chrome are very similar, so they should wear similarly. I believe that for a steady full-auto schedule of fire, that the combination of CHF and CL will yield better results than button-rifled and nitrided, but that's a moot point to the vast majority of us.
In general, button-rifling and nitriding is less expensive to do than CHF/CL, and folks that aren't shooting full-auto can't tell the difference, so not a bad option at all. I'm a big fan of the BA Hanson profile barrels with the pinned gas blocks.
What I'm really curious about is how Glenn Hodge designed his M855A1 EPR barrels to better resist the excessive wear caused by the M855A1 AND significantly boost velocity at the same time. Both of these facts have been proven by testing. The Hodge EPR barrels are made by FN, but they're made to Hodge's specs, and cost more than "regular" FN barrels, which cost more than PSA/FN barrels.
Another example of how one company can make multiple barrels using the CHF/CL methods, but vary widely in specs and resulting retail prices.
Good info. I was talking about the biggest difference to the end user though, someone who's gonna mount a red dot on their carbine.
The difference in longevity and accuracy is probably nill, so the only real difference is $$$
Basically I'm just simping for PSA.
I have a build with a BA Hanson barrel and they are very, very , very good barrels and usually the least expensive barrel I will buy. I have to admit I am a big fan of that design. It's accurate beyond it's price point and soft shooting. They are truly an excellent barrel design.Hard to compare because they're quit different in manufacturing processes and materials. One is CHF/CL and the other is button-rifled and nitrided.
In general, the theory is that when all QC and tolerances are equal, that a nitrided barrel should be more accurate than a chrome-lined barrel. The nitride process is much easier to control the thickness/depth of than chrome-plating. This makes for a more uniform bore, which should be more accurate.
The hardness of nitride and hard chrome are very similar, so they should wear similarly. I believe that for a steady full-auto schedule of fire, that the combination of CHF and CL will yield better results than button-rifled and nitrided, but that's a moot point to the vast majority of us.
In general, button-rifling and nitriding is less expensive to do than CHF/CL, and folks that aren't shooting full-auto can't tell the difference, so not a bad option at all. I'm a big fan of the BA Hanson profile barrels with the pinned gas blocks.
What I'm really curious about is how Glenn Hodge designed his M855A1 EPR barrels to better resist the excessive wear caused by the M855A1 AND significantly boost velocity at the same time. Both of these facts have been proven by testing. The Hodge EPR barrels are made by FN, but they're made to Hodge's specs, and cost more than "regular" FN barrels, which cost more than PSA/FN barrels.
Another example of how one company can make multiple barrels using the CHF/CL methods, but vary widely in specs and resulting retail prices.