O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24
Use of force in defense of property other than a habitation
(a) A person is justified in threatening or using force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to prevent or terminate such other's trespass on or other tortious or criminal interference with real property other than a habitation or personal property:
(1) Lawfully in his possession;
(2) Lawfully in the possession of a member of his immediate family; or
(3) Belonging to a person whose property he has a legal duty to protect.
(b) The use of force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to prevent trespass on or other tortious or criminal interference with real property other than a habitation or personal property is not justified unless the person using such force reasonably believes that it is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
Section A says you are legally allowed to threaten use of force. Then Section B goes on to state that you can't actually use said force unless " person using such force reasonably believes that it is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony." So.... just hope they don't call your bluff lol.
Good post righter13...
OP, it would be good to educate yourself on the laws on the Use of Deadly Force by spending time on gacarry.org clicking the link that takes you to the actual laws & researching them at length... or you could take a class ( I know a guy).
But in all seriousness before rushing out to confront the possible perps. & expecting 16-3-24 to be your saving grace it would be best to learn the definition of "forcible felony" as it pertains to Use of Deadly Force.
It would also be very helpful to learn what is referred to as the "Reasonable Man Doctrine" regarding the same subject.