Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But of course nobody addresses the incredible logic of the quote.
The logic is mute, when people actually having to "earn a living" are working that much harder to provide for other that would rather be taken care of.
I want to be clear, I'm mostly referring to those taking advantage of the system, not those needing a hand up.
You may have missed it. Read the quote.
I read the quote, but it was Liberal as hell, man. That is socialism to the Pepsi Max!!! I personally like working, and I don't need others' money to support me. That's what the regime wants: everyone to live off of the government until ALL of the money runs out (hence the taxpayers/redistribution). Indeed, that man was bankrupt and jobless . . . there goes that logic.
So you have not answered the first question. 1.Define trickle down economics. You then say we should all pay the same on a percentage basis. Followed by the money has to come from somewhere.Neither party is perfect. I find faults with both sets of ideology. I just find a good bit more fault with the Republican platform. One thing neither party seems to grasp and that there are always going to be things that can't be fixed. Attempts to fix these things just breaks something else. Every year for example, people die from gunshot wounds. In any given same year however, many lives are saved by guns. This is the number that needs to be addressed. How many lives can thank a gun...many of which don't even know their lives were saved. Just the probability of a gun being in place thwarts many crimes from ever even occurring. We all know this but we continue either fighting against or for over that one statistic of lives lost.
Since the day this land became a country, we've had to pay taxes to fund our government. Heck, other than the earliest inhabitants (natives), we were paying them before too but just to a different government. Taxes are not a new idea nor are they just a Democratic answer to funding the country. I don't think the upper 2 percent should pay a higher percentage than the working man but I do think they should pay the same. The money has to come from somewhere. Keep borrowing more and more? That's no good. Spend less? Sounds good but doesn't seem to work on paper and no one is happy with the cuts...especially Big Bird. Bush wrote some big checks, didn't account in his budget the cost of war...now Obama is a tyrant for paying the bills Bush rang up. I don't get it.
We sometimes comprehend in different ways. I'm guessing you didn't like the Liberal and Pepsi Max words? I reread everything I said, and I'll still stand by it. That's how I saw that quote. Many others will have different interpretations, but it's usually molded/biased toward one's belief. Your cat looks pissed off at me fuh show.There is a big difference between reading something and understanding it. I am disappointed with the pejoratives you chose. You're better than that.