- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 65,924
- Reaction score
- 73,998
It has nothing to do with population. I assume you've never lived in Florida or Texas? Now THOSE are small deer. In general, the farther south you go the smaller the deer. Just look within this state .While local minerals and diet do have an impact, there are countless subspecies of whitetail in north America and genetically, that 175# Georgia buck is literally a different critter than that 275# Alberta hoss .That's really a problem more than anything else. I have lived in 5 states growing up and I have never seen such anemic deer in all my life here. Virginia and Ohio had massive deer, I mean big deer. I have spent time hunting in Michigan in my early days and deer where nothing short of humongous. I the lack of natural predators and the competition for food is is just killing the heard size. I mean the deer here are almost dog size. I have seen mule deer in Oklahoma almost the size of elk. What needs to happen is a massive culling of the herds so that there is not so much competition for food. I heard down next to the Race Track there are some pretty big deal but there was some genetic modification going on there and that keeps the deer pretty substantial. That information comes from two hunters who rent land down that way to hunt on. Pretty much every deer I have seen the base tine diameter is just to small. I almost feel sorry for the deer here. I won't hunt them simply for the fact that the deer are just to small. Maybe the rise of coyotes will thin out the heard but then in lies another problem. To many coyotes will start infesting the suburban areas and feed of trash simply for fact that it's easier to catch than deer. Something needs to be done to strengthen the population so that there will be more trophy sized bucks out there.