A seven hour raging fire with a disabled sprinkler system, caused by... [drum roll]....
Damage caused by the other larger towers falling. :-)
And, while debris damage to WTC 7's southern exterior was considerable (and initiated the destructive fires), the collapse originated in the northeast portion of the building. In fact, the report concludes: "Even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires."
The report determines that the actual culprit in the collapse was the combustion of ordinary building furnishings
"
Did you not read your own post?
So let's recap. I kept asking you which plane hit WT7 and how does office fires cause a building that size to collapse.
You basically call me an idiot who doesn't understand the physics of the other two building falling, the massive damage it caused surrounding buildings. Ramblings about "massive energy released from the other buildings". Something about "seismic energy" and structural damage it may have caused.
Then you post the article about the NIST findings that do in fact state that office fires alone caused WTC7 to collapse. Like that isn't what I've been saying all this time
Wow is all I can say lol. This is fun though, I'm glad you're researching it and reading the popular mechanics articles and official NIST report. Like I said earlier in the thread, that's exactly where I started looking into all this. It's not the conspiracy theories that convinced something was fishy, it was the official reports.